| Political Platform Amendment: | Safe Space Policy |
|---|---|
| Proposer: | Executive Committee (decided on: 12.03.2026) |
| Status: | Published |
| Submitted: | Today, 17:52 |
2.2 expel the participant involved in the physical incident.
3. In case of an extreme or multiple severe safe space violation, the Executive Committee can limit the participation of a perpetrator in the next activities, including the work in structures such as General Assembly or Council of Members.
Cooperation and Development Network Eastern Europe is a capacity-building
network comprised of different youth and green-minded organisations from Eastern
and Central Europe. Fighting for a Green movement is our common goal but at the
same time, we acknowledge that we differ a lot based on the diverse cultural
environments we come from. In addition, patriarchy/sexism/ nationalistic
discourses are highly embedded in our societies, therefore the creation of a
safe space is a crucial component for CDN activities in helping to dismantle
existing power structures and challenge oppressive mechanisms. This way we
ensure the creation of a welcoming environment where participation is equalised
for all despite the ethnicity /religion/ sexual orientation/gender identity/
class background and different abilities of all (participants, Executive
Committee, Prep Teams and Office).
In general, Safe space policies are the rules by which a community agrees to
behave. They help in guaranteeing that everyone feels free to express themselves
and help prevent some of the problems common in our societies (such as racism,
sexism, transphobia, etc.) from becoming part of the community.
This document provides an overview of what safe spaces are, the definition of
inappropriate behaviour, and what key principles/mechanisms should be followed
when establishing such spaces in CDN’s activities and structures (CDN Executive
Committee and Office, Prep Teams and Working Groups). This document is developed
by a Working team comprised of some of the members of CDN Executive Committee/
Secretariat/ Gender Working Group, and adopted by the General Assembly as an
internal document of CDN in 2021. CDN aims to create a respectful, understanding
and open space, and we encourage everyone, from organisers to participants, to
be pro-active in creating an atmosphere where the safety of everyone is
validated.
This document is a result of consecutive meetings of the Working team throughout
the period between November 2020 - February 2021. The document refers to
experiences documented by previous CDN EC members and Secretariat, who have
recorded cases where safe space was breached at CDN activities. Guidance has
also been taken from other similar youth-oriented organisations, which have
documents in establishing safe spaces, and we are grateful towards all the
organisations who shared with us their resources (see more on page 12).
This document is just a set of mechanisms/ techniques for constructing a safe
space environment but is not a definitive document. We welcome you all to give
us feedback and further suggestions for ensuring safe space at the following
email address: office@cdnee.org.
In this chapter, we will explain the types of behaviours that violate the safe
space as a whole and which we aim to prevent. In case of recognizing some of
these behaviours, please report to Safe Space Persons (SSP). We are aware safe
space is an individual perception, and this list contains general behaviours,
whilst other violations are not excluded. Any other situations that are not
mentioned here but would lead to someone feeling uncomfortable, unsafe or
excluded will be assessed as a violation of safe space and people are welcomed
to voice them out.
Disclaimer: This chapter contains examples of unacceptable types of behaviour
which some readers might find triggering. Examples are listed for the purpose of
better understanding of these types of behaviour. The following behaviours can
vary from moderate to severe violations of safe space, and the measures are
taken accordingly(elaborated further in the last chapter).
Indicating personal boundaries, whether physical or emotional should be a basis
prior to interaction and should be respected at all times. The boundaries are
often defined internally and presented with body language and verbal statements.
These need to be observed, recognized (or verbalized) and respected.
Example: Person X has said they do not want to be touched, and person Y teases
them and “jokingly” touches the person X, and gets within their personal space
without their consent.
Inflicting physical harm or unwanted physical contact upon someone. Any kind of
physical violence or touching without consent is completely unacceptable. Any
kind of touching between people has to be consensual and thoroughly
communicated. Physical assault can also be sexual harassment and is a severe
violation of safe space and personal boundaries. In the physical form of sexual
harassment, assault can be anything from inappropriate touching and teasing to
severe sexual assault and rape (further explained in point Sexual harassment).
Example: Person X punches person Y because of a disagreement of their opinions
during an intense informal discussion about some topic.
Carrying (jewellery, clothing, accessories) or physically presenting (writing,
drawing, mimicking) disrespect and/or hate symbols connected to religious,
national and extreme ideological beliefs.
Example A: During an art session on a CDN activity, the participant draws a
swastika on a piece of paper and shows it to others.
Example B: participant comes to an activity wearing a T-shirt with disrespectful
writings about Muslims.
Stereotyping is acting based on assumed ideas or beliefs regarding someone based
on their gender, sexual orientation, national, religious identity, physical
appearance. Includes assuming facts about someone based on their identities. For
example: assuming that a feminine man is gay. Discrimination is the act of
making unjustified distinctions between individuals on basis of race, gender,
age, ethnicity, language, sexual orientation, disability or other
characteristics. It involves restricting members of one group or an individual
from opportunities that are available to others. Extreme discriminatory
behaviours like racism, chauvinism, nationalism, linguicism, homophobia,
transphobia and similar will not be tolerated in CDN activities.
Example: A group of participants in a session refuse to involve a participant
with hearing difficulties because this person speaks in a manner the group finds
uncomfortable.
This behaviour conveys the idea of treating a person as a commodity or an
object. Another form, sexual objectification is the act of treating a person as
a mere object of sexual desire. Everyone’s individuality and autonomy are their
own and objectifying behaviour is destructive of these characteristics.
Example: participant X is told by another participant “hey girl! You would be
prettier if you smiled”.
Even though sexual harassment can be physical, it’s verbal form is explained in
this chapter. Along with objectifying and bullying, it is the root of other
unacceptable behaviours that can lead to physical assault. Sexual harassment
involves the use of explicit or implicit sexual overtones, non-verbal cues and
signals, unwanted and non-consensual touch and sexual assault.
Sexual harassment includes a wide range of behaviours and interpretations,
examples of which can be found here
(https://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/pdf/whatissh.pdf)
The explanation of something in a patronizing manner, usually by someone who is
privileged because of their gender. This behaviour is often present in group
discussions when the privileged person or a group of people are not allowing
others to present, speak and behave in an authentic way. Mansplaining severely
disturbs dynamics and create a sense of hierarchy and domination of a privileged
person or group.
Example: A cis-gender white man dominates the discussion about gender equality
and argues with the points of the wage gap and denies the existence of
inequality.
The act of not giving chance to speak, speaking over someone, ignoring opinions
etc.
Excluding someone from the conversation on purpose by either not giving them a
chance to speak, speaking over them or ignoring what they are saying. To
marginalize someone and to erase or ignore their presence or contribution.
Example: During an event, participants are divided into small groups and working
on some presentation. Within one group, one participant is missing because has
gone to the bathroom, Meanwhile, the rest continue with the work and take some
important decision without the presence of this participant.
Shaming is the act of bringing negative attention to an individual or a group
because of their opinions; actions; physical, racial, ethnic, religious or
cultural characteristics or activities. Blaming an individual or a group is a
way of shaming them based on actions and the development of a situation.
Unexpected or undesirable results are not a responsibility of the action doer,
and no one should be blamed or feel guilty.
For example: participant X is approached by another participant and asked: “What
is wrong with you? Why do you behave like this?” or “The situation that happened
is your fault and you should face consequences”
Using dismissive language or behaviour towards someone. Especially problematic
when done based on someone’s gender identity, sexual orientation, language,
national or religious identity. Bullying can be verbal, but also physical and
then is seen as physical assault.
Example: Participant X calls participant Y offensive names and laughs at them.
Criticism, if presented in a constructive way, is a tool for growth and
development, however it is often misunderstood. If offered without constructive
feedback, criticism can be connected to insulting, ridiculing and similar
behaviors. However, everyone must be aware of different levels of knowledge,
language, experience, and different opinions, and give feedback accordingly.
For example: While discussing over a topic participant X responds to participant
Y in the following way: “This is stupid, you should stop talking".
Threatening behaviour includes physical or verbal actions that don’t involve
actual contact/injury (moving closer aggressively), general verbal or written
threats to people. Blackmailing is manipulative behaviour that includes the act
of demanding personal and material belongings or degrading and non-consensual
activities with the threat of revealing personal information or compromising
autonomy.
Example: Person X found out person Y is queer, and forces person Y to give them
money or they will “out” them on social media.
(Extremist) Ideological claims are strict beliefs about certain groups,
geographical locations, religious beliefs, cultures and similar identifications
that lead to conflict or violent thoughts and actions.
For example: As it is stated in CDN Political Platform, we should strive to
acknowledge and reject the politics of division and politics that seek to use
nationalistic or any other exclusionary rhetoric at the expense of minorities
and vulnerable groups.
This chapter enlists some practical tools and practices that can help making and
obtaining a safe space environment. These tips are mostly associated with
activity planning and executing, but most of them are suitable for an
organizational level as well.
Inclusivity
One of the first steps in the creation of an inclusive environment is enabling
the participation of people of different backgrounds. When selecting
participants, CDN Secretariat, EC member(s) and Prep Teams (PT) are paying
special attention to underrepresented groups and ensuring their participation.
Depending on the topic of the activity, CDN will spread its calls for
participants to various channels, putting efforts into reaching out to these
marginalized groups even outside of the Green family. Both regional and gender
balance (a minimum of 50% of participants are young people that self-identify as
woman, trans or genderqueer) are taken into consideration.
Ability
Addressing the needs of everyone prior to the activity with a simple
questionnaire (e.g. question box within an application form) will help
organizers (CDN) to be aware of everyone’s needs and assist accordingly if
needed. Local PT (hosting the activity) will secure that the venue/hotel is
accessible for all differently-abled people.
Accessibility
When checking potential venues for the activity, Local PT should take into
account a provisional number of participants and search for working areas that
can host this number of people comfortably (and in different arrangements - e.g.
sitting in circle). It is recommended to choose well-lit venues and ensure
accessibility to all different venues/toilets/rooms of use to participants/Prep
Teams/EC Office members.
Information
Prior to the activity, Local PT should assemble an Infosheet with all the
essential information (local transport & hotel), including a brief cultural and
political background, as to make participants more comfortable with their
travelling. CDN will provide all the other key information about the event
itself, along with the schedule (agenda) and this policy, to familiarize new
participants with the Safe Space.
Introduction
At the beginning of each activity, CDN organizes an introduction session, going
through the agenda, background of the project and CDN. During the Introduction
session, PT will go through moderation rules and introduce diverse communication
tools that will be used throughout the activity. During an introduction session
or shortly after, CDN will propose a round where participants will express their
needs on obtaining a safe space throughout the activity.
Spatial organisation
How CDN arranges participants and chairs in the room depends on the session
itself - whether there’s a movement involved, small groups division, etc.
However, it is recommended arranging participants in a circle/horizontal
arrangement, rather than having a classroom arrangement, for having a more
inclusive environment. Moreover, working room/venue should be noise sensitive.
Language
Facilitators (CDN) will take steps to equalize participation, ensuring all
participants are heard and diverse gender identities are respected - at the
beginning of an activity, all participants will be asked to share their pronouns
and have them along with their name attached visibly.
Facilitators will make sure to speak slowly, clearly, avoiding jargon and
excessive academic language. Acknowledging that the activity is held in English,
participants will be encouraged to use the language sign ‘L’ when a word/phrase
is unclear. Moreover, participants should be encouraged to speak in English also
outside of sessions, not to exclude participants - when someone is using their
native language, anyone can raise it with ‘Bora Bora’ rule. This will be a
gentle reminder for everyone to speak in English. Nonetheless, if someone does
not speak English well, this should not be a basis for excluding person from
activity and that CDN will strive to have at least one more person speaking some
other language that person understands and helps with translation.
HEGs and Morning circles
HEGs are designated groups of smaller number of participants, organised almost
every day of the activity after a full-day programme and moderated by one of the
PT members. This is a space where participants can reflect and share how they
felt throughout the day in a more intimate environment. Each PT member shares
the main thoughts/comments/concerns expressed by the participants during HEGs at
the evening PT meeting. PT can make changes in an agenda, raise some points
during a Morning Circle or introduce new rules according to the results of HEGs
evaluation.
Morning circles are organized every day, before the actual programme begins and
are moderated by one of the PT members. During this circle with all of the
participants, PT will go through any changes/announcements/technical reminders
for the day in question. This is also a space for PT to remind everyone of safe
space and raise a point if anything had happened against safe space guidelines.
Safe Space Persons
Elaborated in the fourth chapter.
Question/Feedback box
During the event, there shall be a box where participants can leave written
notes to facilitators and the PT members with feedback and questions. Some
people might prefer this way of flagging something up, asking a specific
question, or asking for support or a need to be met. The question/feedback box
should be placed in a visible place where everyone can access it, and its
purpose should be explained at the beginning of the activity. Other tools for
anonymous messages can be also used for this purpose.
Evaluation
Participants share how they felt during the event and tell if there were any
situations that made them feel uncomfortable. Safe space persons can also be
contacted online after the activity for the purpose of improving CDN safe space
regulations.
Privacy
No pictures shall be posted on public sites or social networks without the
explicit consent of the individuals who can be identified in them. In the
participants list, every participant will sign a separated column regarding the
consent to be photographed and the consent to disseminate these pictures.
Data storage
CDN stores personal data (collected through application forms) of the
participants/Prep-team members and ensures the safety of data. Data erasure can
be done on the demand of the participant.
Finally, the best and most basic preventive measure is to educate ourselves,
acknowledge privileges we have and build understanding and solidarity for one
another.
The aim of this chapter is to create a sustainable system to prevent, identify
and react to different types of unacceptable behaviour (outlined at chapter 2),
which is not in compliance with the rules for the provision of a safe space
environment in CDN activities (online and offline). These guidelines are written
from the perspective of an international umbrella youth organization.
Disclaimer: This chapter contains hypothetical cases of unacceptable behaviour
which some readers might find triggering. Examples are listed for the purpose of
better understanding of these types of measures taken against these behaviours.
The following cases can vary from moderate to severe violations of safe space,
and the measures are taken accordingly.
The central pillar of the Safe Space preventive measures and reporting mechanism
evolve around the concept of Safe Space Persons (SSP). The SSPs are elected by
the organizers prior to the event and are usually members of CDN EC /
Secretariat/ Prep-teams that aim to prevent, identify and react to cases of
unacceptable behaviour not only during activity sessions but applicable to
breaks and informal parts of events. An SSP should be a person who is
internalized with the Safe Space document and preferably has participated in
previous CDN events. Depending on the capacities, it is recommended to elect two
SSPs.
Safe space persons are beforehand provided with Safe space Toolkit, a document
created by CDN along with Safe Space policy document, which provides knowledge
and detailed procedures of creating safe space and dealing with its potential
violations.
SSPs are present at events to help raise awareness about the topic, intervene in
questionable situations where Safe space principles are breached, and provide a
listening ear to participants who have felt harassed. Nonetheless, we highly
encourage everyone to be proactive in creating an atmosphere where the safety of
others is validated. In case of a safe space breach, there are three stages that
an SSP goes through: 1- Prevention; 2- Identifying; 3- Reporting.
The main aim is always to prevent unacceptable behavior from happening and safe
persons should guarantee this. Before the start of an offline/online event, they
can briefly present the Safe Space document and measures/mechanism entailed in
the document. Prevention methods are elaborated in chapter 3.
Since the document will be sent to participants in advance, the safe space
person should open the floor for questions from the participants, in case that
there is something unclear from the document. After the presentation, the safe
space person should let participants know that he/she/they are the right person
to approach, in case that somebody faces unacceptable behaviour, and this
behaviour goes unnoticed from the safe space person.
Along with the preventive measures from chapter 3, participants and SSP should
conduct regular emotional screening and be observant.
Safe Space persons are trained to identify unacceptable behaviours in CDN
activities and observe participants in a non-intrusive way for the sake of
timely reactions. Unacceptable behaviours are not necessarily obvious and
visible for bystanders and (if not verbalize) can be recognized through body-
language. SSPs are trained to recognize subtle signs and react if someone feels
uncomfortable. This of course depends on the specific context.
The key action in creating safe space, along with prevention, is identifying the
breaches of safe space and boundaries in groups and on a personal level. There
are different ways of recognizing and identifying safe space violations:
Direct report to SSP;
These are usually subtle cases when the SSPs are notified or approached by
participants/ or active bystanders who have noticed some kind of violation or
strange situation. This can be a person directly seeking action to prevent
further harassment, a complaint against other participant, seeking advice etc.
If someone from bystanders notices someone else is feeling uncomfortable, they
can inform SSP who will take further measures.
SSPs observation ;
As mentioned previously, SSPs are observant and notice disturbed power dynamics,
uncomfortable situations etc. by observing body language of participants
(Example: Person A repeatedly sits next to person B on a break, each time person
A moves away and appears uncomfortable. This keeps on happening and person B is
retreating to their room). SSPs in these cases approach these participants and
make sure to understand if there is some underlying issue that needs to be
resolved.
Feedback from the box
The box represents an opportunity specifically for reporting of safe space
violations. The tips can be reported anonymously and will be researched further
by SSP and PT members. Messages in the feedback box don’t necessarily have to be
reports, but also suggestions, for example, to rearrange groups or be aware of
some situations happening outside the venue (for example accommodation). The box
is checked daily for feedback along with other preventive measures, but should
not stop participants of contacting SSP or other PT members on anything
relevant.
The SSP serves as the first line of contact and provides a type of first aid.
Depending on the context, there are different ways of reporting the incident:
the immediate reaction from the SSPs
In this scenario, the SSP are reacting immediately on spot to address the issue
that have disrupted the safe space. This is sometimes done in a very intrusive
way.
Techniques: educating participants, collective emotion check, body awareness
exercise etc.
Examples: For instance, an SSP notices that only some participants are speaking
in a discussion, therefore the SSP suggest to leave space for others who have
not engaged much with the discussion.
communication with victim/perpetrator
In case when there is a breach of Safe Space, SSPs try to identify the victim
and perpetrator and have a moderated conversation separately with each of the
sides involved in the dispute. Through this conversation, the SSP can understand
the reasoning behind the perpetrator’s behaviour and provide emotional support
to the victim.
communicating with the PT;
After consulting with both sides involved in the incident, SSPs sum up the case
to the PT. This way, the PT can adjust the sessions accordingly in order to
avoid similar cases for the rest of the programme, and make sure that everyone
feels included and comfortable.
Based on the scale of the misbehaviour (mild-severe-extreme) there are different
measures to be taken by the SSPs and PT of the activity. We will exemplify this
by showing one hypothetical incident and different escalation of it from mild to
an extreme incident. Let’s imagine that we are facing a case where a transgender
participant is being misgendered by another participant.
Mild case: After the SSPs approach the “harasser”, it turns out that this
is done unintentionally due to the lack of information on the topic/
misuse of the PGP.
Measures: moderated communication/ SSPs remind participants again to read the
Safe space document and ask if something is unclear.
Severe: After the SSPs approach the “harasser”, it turns out that this is
done intentionally due to the discrimination based belief. For instance,
person believes, that only ciswoman are categorized as women and
transwomen are men.
Measures: Emotional support to the victim, explanation to the harasser why their
behaviour is unacceptable and they are asked to apologize to the harassed
person. We can communicate with the problematic participant that if the
behaviour will be repeated, then further measures will be taken. This will be
taken into consideration for their future participation at CDN events, follow-up
from the EC. If the participant is part of CDN MO, CDN EC will proceed with
contacting the MO contact person.
Extreme: when it involves instances of physical harassing/unwanted touch
etc.
Measures: They can bring people to a safe place, away from whomever they felt
harassed by. Furthermore, decisions and actions regarding what happens to people
and an event remain with the organizers and/or CDN EC.
Group discussion can also be made during the event, where people
collectively discuss the situation, and then participants can propose
measures.
In case if there`s an extreme situation (ex. if there is a fight, if the
safety of participants is risked), then the next measure will be:
2.1 contact the authorities;
2.2 expel the participant involved in the physical incident.
3. In case of an extreme or multiple severe safe space violation, the Executive Committee can limit the participation of a perpetrator in the next activities, including the work in structures such as General Assembly or Council of Members.
CDN online spaces in which SS needs to be monitored include chats, mailing lists
and online calls. This is monitored by SSP in accordance to SSP document and “SS
guidelines for online spaces”. If possible, every chat should have at least one
- preferably more SS persons who will overlook discussions and react in case of
SS breaches.
1. Space for all
CDN chats are a space for all people, no matter one's gender, sexuality, race,
religion, nationality, physical ability, etc. Stereotypes and insults are not
allowed on chats. Personal opinion is valued, but it's crucial to give space to
people who are experiencing the discussed issues directly and encourage all
people to share their thought.
2. Respect
There should be respect towards everyone no matter their identities. No
previously outlined unacceptable behaviours are allowed in CDN chats. Trying to
force religious and/or cultural beliefs is forbidden.
3. Gender and pronouns
Every member should respect other people's pronouns which should be clearly
defined (or clarified if not clear). Disrespectful remarks towards a person's
gender and gender identity is unacceptable.
4. Trigger warnings
If a participant is discussing topics that could be triggering to someone, it's
crucial to use trigger warning (TW) or content warning (CW).
5. Misinformation
It's prohibited to spread misinformation in the chats.
6. Verbal and non-verbal communication in calls
Be aware of disctracting behaviours you might show in videos, which might be
interpreted as offensive, insulting or simply distract the speaker (eg.
discussions in chats of the meeting, facial expressions, physical needs,
personal obligations, discussions in chats).
7 Safe space in EC and office
In order to ensure SS in the working structures of CDN, there should be similar
concepts of ensuring SS in terms of unacceptable behaviours and general rules.
It is recommended that 2 safe space persons are appointed - one from office and
one from EC, who mutually consult and communicate on ensuring SS in these
structures. Along with standard preventive methods of ensuring safe space, it is
recommended that SSPs conduct regular (at least every 2 months) SS check with
all members of structures, including persons under temporary contracts with CDN.
In addition to the previously mentioned examples of SS breaches, the SSPs shall
pay attention to the following conditions and situations: burnout states, mental
health issues, communication within the team, working hours and vacation times
etc. SSPs will gather recommendations on the improvement of working conditions,
structure them, and regularly implement new positive practices.
SSP is responsible for chat monitoring, issuing warnings, ending conflicts, and
reporting members that have been warned more than three times for not following
the SS guidelines. SS guidelines are a document outlining procedures and
unacceptable behaviours which can occur in online spaces and ways how to
overcome them, similar to outlined SS policy procedures.
Additionally, SSP for online spaces should be aware and moderate gender balance
and encourage all groups concerned to participate in the discussion. SSP can
restrict people from dominating discussions in order to provide SS for everyone
to share.
If personal attacks, accusations, spreading misinformation or defensive
communication occurs, chat members need to be reminded by the SSP to keep
discussions constructive and reminded of the SS Guidelines and Policy. If
participants ignore this reminder then SSP needs to contact involved
participants privately and bring to their attention the issue.
If necessary SSP should create smaller chats for specific conversations. In case
that conversations are getting out of hand then SSP (also an admin) should
install slow mode (in Telegram chats).
In online meetings in cases of inappropriate verbal and non-verbal communication
or breaking of moderation, SSP should remind of the SS guidelines and if the
behaviour is not stopped after 3 warnings, SSP can restrict online activity as a
meeting admin. In extreme cases of this behaviour, SSP can restrict activity
without warning and contact the involved persons with a warning and
clarification.
Hereby we would like to thank the following organisations for providing
materials and resources with us in the process of creating the Safe Space
Policy.
Col·lectiu Eco-Actiu/ The Ulex project “Anti-oppression toolkit: A
facilitator’s guide”
Association des États Généraux des Étudiants de l’Europe (AEGEE)“Smash
guidelines: Structural measures against sexual harassment”
Federation of Young Europen Greens (FYEG) “Smash Glass ceiling: Handbook
for brave feminist leaders”
Federation of Young European Greens (FYEG) “Internal Rules of Procedure”
European Network of Equality Bodies (Equinet ) “Safe Space Policy for
Equinet Events”
As per now, we do not have mechanism that would limit the safe space violation perpetrators from participation in the statutory events, where the selection is not made by the CDN Team, but it is based on the registration.
Comments